Liberal Burblings

Archive for the ‘Zimbabwe’ Category

I have a confession to make. I’m an old softie. I had a tear in my eye as I watched this video. It’s the official footage of yesterday’s meeting of President Obama and Prime Minister Tsvangirai yesterday. Just months ago I wouldn’t have believed that such a meeting was possible. It really is heartening that the USA is providing demonstrable support for Prime Minister Tsvangirai and the people of Zimbabwe.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vba1jAuJVrw&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b]

I see that President Barack Obama will meet Morgan Tsvangirai, Prime Minister of Zimbabwe, at 3.30pm ET today. Call me an old softie if you will, but it fills me with some hope that such a meeting is taking place.

“Zimbabwe is mine” says Robert Mugabe.

Doesn’t that sum up the whole sorry mess?

He doesn’t say Zimbabwe belongs to Zimbabweans.

It’s his, he says.

It would remind me of Dawn French in those chocolate orange adverts (“This isn’t Terry’s it’s mine”) if it wasn’t so tragic.

Every so often there are events which give one a little hope.

Robert Mugabe and Morgan Tsvangirai shaking hands, having signed an agreement brokered by the SADC, the UN and African Union, is one such event. The fact that it comes on the day the Zimbabwe issued a new 100billion dollar banknote, perhaps might give a clue as to what motivated it. There must be a limit to the amount of time an economy can exist with 2.2 Million per cent inflation without self-combusting. Perhaps it is now apparent that even R Mugabe realises.

I am also encouraged by the fact that the Portuguese police have closed the Maddie McCann “investigation”. That might sound peculiar, but here’s the logic. Without wishing to lapse too much into blogger’s rant-mode, one has to say that the Portuguese police “investigation” of the child’s disappearance hasn’t exactly been productive. They named as sole suspects three people who are now not suspects and that seems to be sum total of their output. The legendary Oozlum bird achieved more (you know the one – the bird that flew round and round and then eventually flew up its own orifice).

So, one has to hope that now the Portuguese police are not “investigating” the disappearance, there might actually be some progress. This is not as mad as it sounds. Now they have closed the case they will at last do something which, so far they have not (much), due to Portuguese law. They will release all the details of their investigations to the McCanns. The Maddie McCann appeal has reportedly raised well over £1 million. That is sufficient, I would have thought, to fund an extensive investigation (note – no inverted commas for that one) by private investigators, who will now have the benefit of the case notes of the Portuguese police.

We can only hope that something positive comes out of this.

Well done to Norman Lamb for securing a parliamentary debate on Zimbabwe yesterday.

I would like to associate myself with, and unreservedly commend, the following views expressed in the debate by my member of Parliament, Richard Benyon (enjoy that sentence, you’ll not often see it on this blog!):

I shall contribute briefly to this debate. We are all running out of adjectives with which to describe the regime in Zimbabwe. In a way, describing its actions is a waste of time, because we want to get down to discussing other details, but last night I sent to the hon. Member for Vauxhall (Kate Hoey), who is the courageous and highly respected chairman of the all-party group on Zimbabwe, some e-mails that had been sent to me about precisely what is happening. There is an organised campaign of terror by Mugabe’s Central Intelligence Organisation and senior echelons in the army against the Movement for Democratic Change and the courageous people of Zimbabwe. It is highly moving and deeply distressing to hear exactly how brutal and vile the regime is being at this time.
To the outside world, one of Mugabe’s most perverse acts is the abandon with which he prints money. The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe is printing money as though it were confetti, because Zimbabwe’s Government believe that, by so doing, they have more money. That is the most economically illiterate thing that they could be doing. It is driving a nation that has been impoverished by the regime into even greater poverty.
I pay tribute to the hon. Member for North Norfolk (Norman Lamb) for securing this debate. In a debate on sanctions, we must ask how that Government are physically able to print money, because what is absolutely certain is that the banknotes are not being printed in Zimbabwe. As a Back-Bench MP, it is relatively difficult to find out precisely where they are being printed, but I suspect that it is relatively easy for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to find out. Through rumours and articles that we might read in Africa Confidential or other papers, we have been led to believe that they are being printed in Germany. If that is the case, I want to look into the eyes of the company’s directors to see whether they are ashamed of their complicity in the impoverishment of Zimbabwe; I want to find out from the German Government what they are doing to bring pressure to bear on the company; and I want to find out from the European Union Commission what pressure it is bringing to bear on companies such as that one which support the vile and perverse actions of the Government of Zimbabwe.
At times, I have a problem with the approach of the FCO to what is happening in Zimbabwe. I visited the country in 2000 or 2001 with my right hon. Friend the Member for Horsham (Mr. Maude), who was then the shadow Foreign Secretary, after having gone there many times in the past and having worked with members of the Movement for Democratic Change. I saw that the MDC was rising as a real political force in that country, but diplomats in our high commission were saying, “No, no, we should not be talking to the MDC. We should be talking to the young bloods in ZANU-PF. They are the future.” That was not my reading of the situation.
I was alarmed recently to discover that an enormous amount of weight was being put behind Simba Makoni as a possible future political figure in Zimbabwe. In fact, he did not have much traction with the electorate. I feel that the tentacles that diplomats put out in Zimbabwe are not really bringing back the true message—which perhaps they do not want to hear—that the MDC is the Opposition, whatever we hear about different factions, and we should be putting our weight securely behind the MDC.
I have often raised another aspect of sanctions—I raised it with the right hon. Member for Blackburn (Mr. Straw) when he was the Foreign Secretary. Many family members and followers of the cronies and thugs who are part of Robert Mugabe‘s coterie come to this country and benefit from our education and health systems and various other aspects of our tolerant western liberal democracy. The right hon. Gentleman said, “You cannot visit the sins of the fathers on their sons, daughters, cousins and aunts.” Well, I am sorry, but we have reached the stage where we just jolly well can and we must, because if those people are denied education and benefits from our health service and are prevented from doing business in this country, they will take a strong message back to Zimbabwe and will be forced to live in the country to whose impoverishment they have contributed.
If Barclays bank has been complicit, it has strong questions to answer, but in a debate such as this we should really look at who the true villains are in supporting the Government of Zimbabwe. We all know from history that the Government of South Africa can turn the switch off on the Government of Zimbabwe, given the way that Vorster turned the switch off on Smith in Rhodesia. I will not delay hon. Members any longer expressing my disappointment—that is a mild word for it—and deep frustration with the Government of Thabo Mbeki. I hope that Jacob Zuma will take a different approach. I sense that the new people moving into the governance of countries in the Southern African Development Community have a more modern, enlightened approach, and we must hope for more from them.
I do not believe that we as a Parliament can ignore—particularly at this time of the Olympics—the complicity of China in many of the problems in southern Africa. China supports the Governments of Sudan and Zimbabwe and they have been found out. Many hon. Members know that, whil
e our Foreign Office is deciding how to cut costs here and different missions there, China has been buying up Africa—buying the infrastructure and companies—and providing arms, financial support and, no doubt, banking support to Governments such as the Government of Zimbabwe. How could they do that at a time like this? I hope that the Minister will tell us today that the Foreign Office is being as strong as it possibly can in saying to the Government of China, “You are in the eye of the storm now. The world is looking at you at the time of the Olympics. You have to join the world condemnation of such regimes, not just by warm words but by your actions. You have the power, as the Government of China, to turn off the tap of your support for regimes such as the one in Zimbabwe.”