The tragic case of Margaret Moran
It is hard to imagine a more pitiful figure than that of Margaret Moran as she attended court today. Compare this photo, at the height of her political career, of her proudly wearing a hat with a large red flower in it, with this photo of her today in the Evening Standard. Indeed, the Telegraph helpfully shows both photos side by side here.
Then have a look at the video below of her departure from the court. She was obviously crying throughout, as she did, reportedly, throughout the five minute hearing. The referral of charges were apparently delayed because of her ill health.
I don’t think I have ever seen anyone leaving court in such a pitiable state.
I feel sympathy for her and her family, as a fellow human being.
She is, of course, innocent unless and until she is proven guilty.
But it is hard not to feel mixed emotions here. The BBC relates the charges Ms Moran faces here:
Prosecutor Louis Mably told the court that the charges involved a total of around £80,000.
The Evening Standard says:
Moran, 56, the former MP for LutonSouth, is accused of the largest fraud in the parliamentary expenses scandal.
It is all rather tragic.
It may be timely to remember how Ms Moran first responded to the allegations on the BBC Politics Show in the clip below. It was interesting to hear that “the reality of my life”, as she put it, was that she needed three homes, including one in Southampton, 100 miles from her constituency. But what was not entirely clearly answered is why the taxpayer had to support such a network of households.
Tweet
Related posts:




She had the taxpayer paying for her to have three houses, when many of her constituents can’t afford one. I find it hard to have any sympathy for her.
I Think the media should be ashamed of hounding a broken woman like this. Everyone wants to bully her because they think she got away with stealing their lollipops! They forget she did seek advice and had her expenses passed by her department. Why isn’t there more media focus on why the expenses were passed, surely the blame should be with them and not with the girl who sought their advice and was told it was in order for her to claim?