Paul Clarke case – curiouser and curiouser

Holly Thompson, the Surrey Mirror journalist who reported on the Paul Clarke case has been twittering with some vital details:

  • The story was covered by The Sun on Page 25 last Thursday (though I can’t find a link for it). It was an “EXCLUSIVE”.
  • Ms Thompson was in court for the full two days of the trial
  • Mr Clarke previously had a successful appeal against conviction in a “broomhandle case
  • The Surrey Mirror is launching a campaign to get Mr Clarke out of jail
  • When he phoned the police (before his visit) “He didn’t tell police he had a gun. He said: “I’ve got something to give you”. He admits that was mistake but didn’t know the law “
  • “Mr Clarke didn’t take the stand. His written statement was read out in court and not disputed by the prosecution..”
  • “Why did they prosecute? This is my guess work but I’m guessing they took his statment as an admission of guilt due to strict liability”
  • “He was charged for the Possession of a prohibited firearm”. I have found this snippet: “The penalty for possession of a prohibited firearm without a certificate is a maximum of ten years in prison and an uncapped fine. Certain kinds of firearm (my italics) attract a mandatory minimum of five years”
  • Ms Thompson points to the current Home Office “Guidance to the Police – Firearms Law”. On Page 129 I have found this:

25.5 Anyone surrendering an illegally held
firearm should be questioned discreetly with
a view to establishing its history but, unless
circumstances exist to give serious cause for
concern as to its provenance (for example,
if it appears to have been stolen), the
person handing it in should not be pressed.
The emphasis should be on creating an
environment in which people hand in illegally
held firearms.

This guidance seems quite a long way from what happened in this case, unless some vital detail has been missed somewhere (and Ms Thompson seems to have approached this story with great vigour for detail).

Related posts:

  1. Younger-Ross: brilliant statement on LibDem attitude to Simone Clarke
  2. Simone Clarke, the BNP’s ballet dancer – fair game!
  3. Former soldier may get five years in prison for 'handing a gun in to the police'
  4. Intriguing comments by Councillor Richard Barnbrook about Simone Clarke
  5. Prescott: Playing with the Kenneth Clarke Croquet set

3 Responses to “Paul Clarke case – curiouser and curiouser”

Leave a Reply

Unsolicited praise
" I am a fan!" - Dr Evan Harris
Follow paulwalteruk on Twitter
Unsolicited praise
"There is a refreshing frankness to the musings of Liberal Burblings which single this blog out. The ability to not mince one's words is highly prized here and, when combined with the ability to profane without insulting the reader's intelligence, is excellent. Whether pondering on the state of the Lib Dems, the country or the world at large, you can rely on Liberal Burblings to tell it like he thinks it is." - www.politics.co.uk
Lower Manhattan
Me with Paddy
New York

The actors and jesters are here
The stage is in darkness and clear
For raising the curtain
And no one's quite certain whose play it is

-Supertramp "If everyone was listening"
My desk
Me with Nick
We are often Golden
Featured on Liberal Democrat Voice

And the three men I admire most:
The father, son, and the holy ghost,
They caught the last train for the coast
The day the music died.

"American Pie" Don McLean
Upton, Cornwall
Paul

Burbler-in-chief
Glasgow – the Clyde
Bude, Cornwall
Wise words
What is this life if, full of care, We have no time to stand and stare? W.H.Davies
Notice
The views expressed in main posts here (excluding comments) are the personal views of the website owner only, and are not the views of any other person or corporate body. Comments underneath posts are not the opinions of the website owner. The website owner is not responsible for the content of external internet sites which are the subject of links on this website.
Malahide, Ireland