Is the "Bradley effect" going to kibosh Obama?

The wonkosphere has turned it’s attention to the role of the undecideds in the US Presidential election. With the polls showing a stable trend, with perhaps a little tightening, and with McCain forced to run robocalls in his own state and dodgy adverts on C&W stations in Virginia, the picture is in Obama’s favour.

However, the one remaining mystery area is the undecideds. In each poll there is around 7% of the little devils. If they all break for McCain (which wouldn’t surprise me) Obama is going to have great difficulty getting to 270 electoral votes.

In the Salon yesterday, Bill Greener argued, based on the supposed “Bradley effect“, that most of the undecideds will go for McCain, leaving Obama on shaky ground.

There are a number of difficulties with Greener’s argument.

1. It is arguable that the Bradley effect didn’t actually exist in the first place. The polls on the actual election day showed Bradley heading for defeat anyway.

2. All Greener’s examples of Bradleyesque effects can be offset, I suspect, by other examples of where African Americans have been elected according to the polls.

3. If the Bradley effect were, for the sake of argument, a 3 percentage points phenomenum, then it could well be offset by a 2-3 point “mobile phone” effect going the other way. It has been pointed out that pollsters are consistently going for landline voters while ignoring mobile phone owners, who overwhelming go for Obama.

4. Obama isn’t black. He is of mixed race. He straddles two cultures. His upbringing in Hawaii in the care of his (white) grandparents does, I suspect, offset many Bradleyesque effects in people’s minds.

5. It is 26 years since the Tom Bradley election. US voters have moved on.

6. Greener’s theory is based on the sweeping and unsubstantiated supposition that the remaining undecideds have already seen enough of Obama and don’t like him. However, today I have seen some ultra-wonkish figures which demonstrate, reasonably authoritatively, that the undecideds will split about 54-46 in Obama’s favour.

To read more about this and actually drown in wonkishness, read Mark Blumenthal in the National Journal Online here.

Related posts:

  1. Palin has done wonders for Democrats' support for Obama!
  2. Palin has done wonders for Democrats’ support for Obama!
  3. Momentum shifts back to Obama
  4. Oprah effect helps Obama
  5. Obama's Hawaii trip – could have been written into the script by his campaign manager

Leave a Reply

Unsolicited praise
" I am a fan!" - Dr Evan Harris
Follow paulwalteruk on Twitter
Unsolicited praise
"There is a refreshing frankness to the musings of Liberal Burblings which single this blog out. The ability to not mince one's words is highly prized here and, when combined with the ability to profane without insulting the reader's intelligence, is excellent. Whether pondering on the state of the Lib Dems, the country or the world at large, you can rely on Liberal Burblings to tell it like he thinks it is." - www.politics.co.uk
Lower Manhattan
Me with Paddy
New York

The actors and jesters are here
The stage is in darkness and clear
For raising the curtain
And no one's quite certain whose play it is

-Supertramp "If everyone was listening"
My desk
Me with Nick
We are often Golden
Featured on Liberal Democrat Voice

And the three men I admire most:
The father, son, and the holy ghost,
They caught the last train for the coast
The day the music died.

"American Pie" Don McLean
Upton, Cornwall
Paul

Burbler-in-chief
Glasgow – the Clyde
Bude, Cornwall
Wise words
What is this life if, full of care, We have no time to stand and stare? W.H.Davies
Notice
The views expressed in main posts here (excluding comments) are the personal views of the website owner only, and are not the views of any other person or corporate body. Comments underneath posts are not the opinions of the website owner. The website owner is not responsible for the content of external internet sites which are the subject of links on this website.
Malahide, Ireland